Some losses were very rough because of opposing mythics and at least 2 were to those obnoxious "I don't do **** but look at my counter-twig" UW(b) decks. Afaik the matchmaking in that mode doesn't take deck strength into account so I tried to do the best with what I had:įinished 2-3 and 4-3 and picked up 4 rares among the gained cards, so I feel decently compensated. Thank you very much for this detailed response.īefore reading this I started the Young CGB vid and picked up the hint to try Quick Constructed. Last edited by AD2016 on Wed 12:46 pm, edited 2 times in total. Tldr: 4 Steel Leaf, 4 Blossoming, 3-4 Brontodon, 4 Merfolk Branchwalker. It's a very wildcard intensive deck to make but you seem to have a nice foundation, good luck with it! Another non rare card I'd be looking to craft more of would be Thrashing Brontodon since it's just so useful in a few different matchups, though I'd be making 4 Steel Leaf first! Merfolk Branchwalker is a decent substitute 2 drop for the Scroungers for now too. Given that your curve is high I'd run Nissa, Vital Force for sure, and probably Vivien Reid too, over whichever 5 drops you like least. You need more Blossoming Defense and they're not rare - replacing the enchantment so that you're removing a 2-1 against you (they kill enchanted creature with 1 card, you lose 2 cards, I know casting it on vine mare is nice, but bit niche) for keeping you creature alive cheaply/a good combat trick. If you're finding the removal useful then by all means keep it in.
Mtg standard meta vine mare plus#
As for removal, the deck needs a lot of creatures since it sets out to get ghalta out asap, plus it wants to consistently curve out strongly - and honestly the removal won't do much since the creatures the deck has problems with need to be exiled not killed.
Ideally you want to be killing them on turn 4 or 5, so running 4/5 drops isn't helpful to that goal. One thing to note about the landbase is that it's actually 20 lands+4 pump spells disguised as lands. You do want to aim for a lower curve, but the cards needed to make the deck really good like that are rare (more rampagers, Thorn Lieutenant) so for now I wouldn't worry too much about curve, but you will win less than you could be. Just be aware that you'll do worse against control without the recursive scrapheap. Scrapheap is a strong card, but if you're not playing with a sideboard you miss the other options that black gives you so for starting out with the deck I'd say ignore black for now and focus on the green cards first. Steel Leaf is huge, it's what the deck revolves around. Is it because it's a dead draw vs control and "win more" vs other creature decks? Reason for no removal? I really like Rabid Bite and its cousins but the pros don't run it. Would I fare better if I could cast two creatures a turn so they can only counter the first? This sounds logical to me but then I don't see how I shall have so many cards. My 4 and 5 drops appear to be much stronger, especially given that I get to 5 mana quite easily with 24 lands and multiple dorks. Or should I rather purchase the raw power of Steel Leaf Champion?Īlso, is my curve too expensive? I don't feel like I have many relevant 2 or 3 drops in my (un-)common pool.
I have this card in a Zombie deck, but would this be the biggest improvement for me? Which rares have the biggest impact? Though this is a "mono" green deck, it features 8 rare BG lands only to support the Scrapheap Scrounger's graveyard ability. Now about the comparison to the meta deck: Often I think my deck never had a shot to beat that opponent. Sometimes I win everything, then I lose everything. Does this even work? The matchmaking feels really awkward.
I haven't spent any rare or mythic Wildcards yet.įirst, the obvious: I have removed several of those Mythics in an effort to avoid too strong opposing decks. I am a f2p player for about 3 weeks now and have some background experience from Duels.
0 kommentar(er)
